HR & L&D PLANNING RESOURCE

How to Build an AI Training Plan for Your Employees

An employee AI training plan should define who needs training, which tasks they will practise, what tools they may use and how progress will be assessed. The example below shows how to organize a four-week programme and adapt it for different roles.

Prepared by School of Core AI · Review date: 12 November 2026

1. Training-Needs Assessment

Roles

List the roles that will use AI weekly (business users, managers, developers) and their daily workload.

Current skills

Record what each group already does with AI tools today, if anything. Self-reported plus one practical check.

Tool access

Which tools and licences participants may use, under whose account, with what data boundaries.

Task selection

Pick recurring tasks with clear inputs and outputs — documents, briefs, analyses, code reviews.

Data restrictions

What material may enter a tool, what must stay out, and who verifies compliance.

2. Role-to-Curriculum Map

Role

Curriculum focus

Starting depth

Evidence produced

Business users

Everyday AI workflows on their own documents

No coding; tool familiarity

Reviewed work sample + accuracy checklist

Managers

Use-case selection, pilots and review habits

Process literacy; no coding

Pilot brief with success criteria

Developers

Building and evaluating AI-assisted workflows

Working Python

Working exercise with evaluation notes

3. Illustrative Four-Week Schedule

One two-hour session per week per participant, with a practical exercise between sessions. Adjust pacing to the role and workload.

Week

Theme

Exercise

Review point

1

Foundations and task selection

Map one real weekly task; identify data boundaries

Task suitability check

2

Guided practice

Produce a draft with source material using approved tools

Source-supported draft reviewed

3

Applied workflow

Complete a role-based workflow exercise end to end

Work sample reviewed against checklist

4

Quality and independence

Self-review with checklist; plan follow-up tasks

Repeatable checklist demonstrated

4. Cohort Capacity: the Arithmetic Behind a Plan

Example: 50 employees, four weeks

  • · Two groups of 25 participants.
  • · Each group: one two-hour session per week for four weeks.
  • · Scheduled training: eight hours per participant.
  • · Live instructor delivery: 16 hours across the two groups.
  • · Excludes preparation, marking, administration and follow-up.

Stress test: 200 employees, eight weeks

  • · At 25 participants per cohort and one parallel session per week, 200 employees need 8 cohorts — 16 weekly instructor delivery hours.
  • · Adding a second parallel instructor halves calendar duration; three cohorts can run concurrently.
  • · Session frequency, cohort size and instructor count are the three levers — name your assumptions in the plan.

This is a planning calculation for the reader, not a statement of SCAI's minimum size or available instructor capacity.

5. Before/After Assessment Rubric

Criterion

Before training

After training

Task quality

Work meets only part of the task definition

Work meets the task definition with named limitations

Verification

Outputs accepted without source checks

Key claims traced to sources; errors flagged

Tool use

Tool use ad hoc; data rules unclear

Approved tools and data boundaries applied consistently

6. Follow-Up Scorecard

Usage check (2–4 weeks)

Are participants still completing the trained tasks with the checklist? Owner: L&D.

Task outcome (6–8 weeks)

Compare rework and turnaround on the trained tasks. Owner: department manager.

Escalation trend

Track questions and errors reaching experts. Owner: team lead; feed back for refresher scope.

7. When Internal Delivery Is Enough — and When It Is Not

Internal delivery usually fits when

  • · The tasks are simple, repeated workflows with clear rules.
  • · A subject-matter expert inside the company can run the sessions.
  • · The tool stack is already approved and supported.

Commission external support when

  • · Multiple roles need structured, different curriculum at the same time.
  • · You need an independent before/after assessment design.
  • · Engineering teams need reviewed retrieval, tool-use and evaluation work.

Need a trainer to deliver this programme for your teams? Review the corporate AI training programmes and request a proposal →